<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:bx="http://bx.businessweek.com">
<title>Business and the Supreme Court - Business Exchange</title>
<subtitle>Most Active Articles</subtitle>
<link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/business-and-the-supreme-court/most-active/feed" rel="self"/>
<link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/business-and-the-supreme-court"/>
<updated>2009-11-26T01:30:07.544-05:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Business Exchange</name>
<email>Business_Exchange@businessweek.com</email>
</author>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:topic:most-active:business-and-the-supreme-court</id>
<bx:suggester>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:suggester>
<entry>
<title>NFL brief in American Needle antitrust case makes compelling argument for single entity status</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/nfl-brief-in-american-needle-antitrust-case-makes-compelling-argument-for-single-entity-status/3043929304884673199-d796ea4d3ca6cd4d30068effc4a2c9ec/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:3043929304884673199-d796ea4d3ca6cd4d30068effc4a2c9ec</id>
<updated>2009-11-24T09:31:14.309-05:00</updated>
<summary>In a brilliant, 66-page brief filed this week in the U.S. Supreme Court, NFL owners and their lawyers describe a form of fantasy football that easily could become a nightmare for the league&#39;s players and coaches. The owners&#39; legal fantasy is to...</summary>
<content type="html">In a brilliant, 66-page brief filed this week in the U.S. Supreme Court, NFL owners and their lawyers describe a form of fantasy football that easily could become a nightmare for the league&#39;s players and coaches. The owners&#39; legal fantasy is to...</content>
<source>
<title>sports.espn.go.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/commentary/news/story?page=munson/091119</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>1</bx:total>
<bx:view>0</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>1</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Court rejects Patterson housing fee case </title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/court-rejects-patterson-housing-fee-case-/7380116390825957999-951fbdf0d7f6b2d89669cfc7ab7270e7/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:7380116390825957999-951fbdf0d7f6b2d89669cfc7ab7270e7</id>
<updated>2009-11-18T16:18:50.982-05:00</updated>
<summary>The U.S. Supreme Court put the final nail in the coffin of a lawsuit against the city of Patterson this week when it refused to review a lower court decision that struck down the city&#39;s affordable housing fees. Patterson likely owes hundreds of...</summary>
<content type="html">The U.S. Supreme Court put the final nail in the coffin of a lawsuit against the city of Patterson this week when it refused to review a lower court decision that struck down the city&#39;s affordable housing fees. Patterson likely owes hundreds of...</content>
<source>
<title>modbee.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.modbee.com/local/story/938158.html</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>5</bx:total>
<bx:view>4</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>U.S. Supreme Court declines &#39;Redskins&#39; suit</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/us-supreme-court-declines-redskins-suit/17602357040891010361-8044cb82bd890f4120cfd20a668383e3/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:17602357040891010361-8044cb82bd890f4120cfd20a668383e3</id>
<updated>2009-11-17T10:21:05.617-05:00</updated>
<summary>WASHINGTON -- The Washington Redskins ended their four-game losing streak Sunday. On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court handed the professional football team another victory, declining to hear a petition alleging its use of the &quot;Redskins&quot; mascot is...</summary>
<content type="html">WASHINGTON -- The Washington Redskins ended their four-game losing streak Sunday. On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court handed the professional football team another victory, declining to hear a petition alleging its use of the &quot;Redskins&quot; mascot is...</content>
<source>
<title>online.wsj.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125837729336750349.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLTopStories</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>2</bx:total>
<bx:view>1</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Pesticide Case Merits Supreme Court’s Attention</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/pesticide-case-merits-supreme-courts-attention/16631965166000060308-165f6c3730daab876770fdb72c32714f/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:16631965166000060308-165f6c3730daab876770fdb72c32714f</id>
<updated>2009-11-16T14:59:07.800-05:00</updated>
<summary>By John Hart, American Federation Farm Bureau, Not every legal dispute merits the attention of the U.S. Supreme Court. Only the most serious and far reaching issues tend to make it to the highest court in the land. A case that should be considered...</summary>
<content type="html">By John Hart, American Federation Farm Bureau, Not every legal dispute merits the attention of the U.S. Supreme Court. Only the most serious and far reaching issues tend to make it to the highest court in the land. A case that should be considered...</content>
<source>
<title>naturalresourcereport.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://naturalresourcereport.com/2009/11/pesticide-case-merits-supreme-court%E2%80%99s-attention/</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>1</bx:total>
<bx:view>0</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The patent question: Time for an update</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/the-patent-question-time-for-an-update/8232243338882502649-fa348d10cf0df1ea28d614069515c19b/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:8232243338882502649-fa348d10cf0df1ea28d614069515c19b</id>
<updated>2009-11-16T15:02:39.313-05:00</updated>
<summary>For American business to remain competitive through innovation in the 21st-century global economy, the U.S. Supreme Court must reject -- and Congress must put an end to -- the 19th-century perspective of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.</summary>
<content type="html">For American business to remain competitive through innovation in the 21st-century global economy, the U.S. Supreme Court must reject -- and Congress must put an end to -- the 19th-century perspective of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.</content>
<source>
<title>pittsburghlive.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/s_653103.html</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>6</bx:total>
<bx:view>6</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Supreme Court case illustrates absurdity of US patent law</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/supreme-court-case-illustrates-absurdity-of-us-patent-law/3118806694955904942-1a6bf4ed34d7804c1f9b066b0f0b74b5/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:3118806694955904942-1a6bf4ed34d7804c1f9b066b0f0b74b5</id>
<updated>2009-11-11T11:26:03.756-05:00</updated>
<summary>It took less than two minutes Monday for the high-stakes patent case in the Supreme Court to descend to the level of questioning whether “Lorenzo Jones” could get a patent on one of his hare-brained inventions, if Bernard Bilski and Rand Warsaw...</summary>
<content type="html">It took less than two minutes Monday for the high-stakes patent case in the Supreme Court to descend to the level of questioning whether “Lorenzo Jones” could get a patent on one of his hare-brained inventions, if Bernard Bilski and Rand Warsaw...</content>
<source>
<title>eideard.wordpress.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://eideard.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/supreme-court-case-illustrates-absurdity-of-us-patent-law/</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>9</bx:total>
<bx:view>8</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Massey Energy Gets $50 Million Jury Verdict Overturned Again</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/massey-energy-gets-50-million-jury-verdict-overturned-again/13257730582690586328-108b7394b6e0481b6d1d0eb07ba3a253/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:13257730582690586328-108b7394b6e0481b6d1d0eb07ba3a253</id>
<updated>2009-11-13T11:53:41.270-05:00</updated>
<summary> Massey Energy Co., the fifth-largest U.S. coal company, succeeded for a second time in getting a $50 million jury verdict thrown out five months after the U.S. Supreme Court said West Virginia’s highest court had to re-hear...</summary>
<content type="html"> Massey Energy Co., the fifth-largest U.S. coal company, succeeded for a second time in getting a $50 million jury verdict thrown out five months after the U.S. Supreme Court said West Virginia’s highest court had to re-hear...</content>
<source>
<title>bloomberg.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=ayjlZYf0x_F4</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>1</bx:total>
<bx:view>0</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Clock Winding Down On Patent Scams?</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/clock-winding-down-on-patent-scams/4449113532213106982-91eb423d8039ad896bceafd4f175944b/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:4449113532213106982-91eb423d8039ad896bceafd4f175944b</id>
<updated>2009-11-13T11:59:00.719-05:00</updated>
<summary>This column was written by Evan Schuman, the editor of StorefrontBacktalk.com, a site that tracks retail technology, e-commerce and security issues. Retail Realities appears each Friday. Evan can be reached at e-mail and on Twitter.</summary>
<content type="html">This column was written by Evan Schuman, the editor of StorefrontBacktalk.com, a site that tracks retail technology, e-commerce and security issues. Retail Realities appears each Friday. Evan can be reached at e-mail and on Twitter.</content>
<source>
<title>cbsnews.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/11/13/opinion/main5634436.shtml</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>1</bx:total>
<bx:view>0</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>What boards of directors can learn from the Supreme Court</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/what-boards-of-directors-can-learn-from-the-supreme-court/13958600296077163100-1899a82254396e7d3e86d8ef3226fd3e/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:13958600296077163100-1899a82254396e7d3e86d8ef3226fd3e</id>
<updated>2009-11-12T11:29:39.761-05:00</updated>
<summary>(Editor’s note: Brad Feld is an early stage investor and co-founder of Foundry Group. This post originally appeared on his blog.) I had an incredible experience this week. My friend Phil Weiser, who is now the Deputy Assistant Attorney General at...</summary>
<content type="html">(Editor’s note: Brad Feld is an early stage investor and co-founder of Foundry Group. This post originally appeared on his blog.) I had an incredible experience this week. My friend Phil Weiser, who is now the Deputy Assistant Attorney General at...</content>
<source>
<title>entrepreneur.venturebeat.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://entrepreneur.venturebeat.com/2009/11/12/what-boards-of-directors-can-learn-from-the-supreme-court/</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>2</bx:total>
<bx:view>1</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Is the House healthcare reform bill unconstitutional?</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/is-the-house-healthcare-reform-bill-unconstitutional/11880053886022673475-0cb51285bba4c90b8bdab66605554157/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:11880053886022673475-0cb51285bba4c90b8bdab66605554157</id>
<updated>2009-11-09T10:22:33.795-05:00</updated>
<summary>Healthcare reform critics gathered at the Capitol Thursday for a very public “House Call” protest ahead of Saturday’s scheduled vote on the House bill. Behind the scenes, however, lawyers connected with the Tea Party movement are planning a legal...</summary>
<content type="html">Healthcare reform critics gathered at the Capitol Thursday for a very public “House Call” protest ahead of Saturday’s scheduled vote on the House bill. Behind the scenes, however, lawyers connected with the Tea Party movement are planning a legal...</content>
<source>
<title>features.csmonitor.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2009/11/05/is-the-house-healthcare-reform-bill-unconstitutional/</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>10</bx:total>
<bx:view>9</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>U.S. Supreme Court Monitor - Home Court Showdown at the Supreme Court</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/us-supreme-court-monitor---home-court-showdown-at-the-supreme-court/3053501091120453725-468af5ed3483e003f97637ac93b7daf2/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:3053501091120453725-468af5ed3483e003f97637ac93b7daf2</id>
<updated>2009-11-11T10:59:05.893-05:00</updated>
<summary>The auto rental giant Hertz is incorporated in Delaware, has its headquarters in New Jersey and does its biggest volume of business in California. So where is Hertz&#39;s &quot;principal place of business?&quot; The answer depends on which federal appellate court...</summary>
<content type="html">The auto rental giant Hertz is incorporated in Delaware, has its headquarters in New Jersey and does its biggest volume of business in California. So where is Hertz&#39;s &quot;principal place of business?&quot; The answer depends on which federal appellate court...</content>
<source>
<title>law.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.law.com/jsp/scm/PubArticleSCM.jsp?id=1202435311303&amp;Home_Court_Showdown_at_the_Supreme_Court</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>1</bx:total>
<bx:view>0</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Pocono attorneys win airing from U.S. Supremes</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/pocono-attorneys-win-airing-from-us-supremes/9392798220103978101-bd3712678e42268bb92c430cf4162d20/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:9392798220103978101-bd3712678e42268bb92c430cf4162d20</id>
<updated>2009-11-10T10:42:34.361-05:00</updated>
<summary>For an actor or actress, it&#39;s receiving an Oscar or Emmy nomination. For an athlete, it&#39;s playing in the championship at the highest professional level. For two local attorneys, the pinnacle of professional achievement was bringing a legal appeal...</summary>
<content type="html">For an actor or actress, it&#39;s receiving an Oscar or Emmy nomination. For an athlete, it&#39;s playing in the championship at the highest professional level. For two local attorneys, the pinnacle of professional achievement was bringing a legal appeal...</content>
<source>
<title>poconorecord.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091109/NEWS/911090329</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>1</bx:total>
<bx:view>0</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Supreme Court to Study Patents on Business Methods</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/supreme-court-to-study-patents-on-business-methods/2737834411722223242-935188fc026c044ba528a199e43cd4e1/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:2737834411722223242-935188fc026c044ba528a199e43cd4e1</id>
<updated>2009-11-09T10:16:24.780-05:00</updated>
<summary>Microsoft Corp., Bank of America Corp. and L.L. Bean Inc. are just some of the companies that have flooded the Supreme Court with advice as it prepares for Monday&#39;s arguments over one of the biggest questions involving intellectual property: When...</summary>
<content type="html">Microsoft Corp., Bank of America Corp. and L.L. Bean Inc. are just some of the companies that have flooded the Supreme Court with advice as it prepares for Monday&#39;s arguments over one of the biggest questions involving intellectual property: When...</content>
<source>
<title>online.wsj.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704328104574517882062296034.html?mod=googlenews_wsj</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>2</bx:total>
<bx:view>1</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>SFLC Provides Background Info for Bilski</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/sflc-provides-background-info-for-bilski/1795537401288468051-65a94c474168e1500cc0ec96a18fedd5/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:1795537401288468051-65a94c474168e1500cc0ec96a18fedd5</id>
<updated>2009-11-09T10:41:01.621-05:00</updated>
<summary>The U.S. Supreme Court will be hearing opening arguments on Bilski vs. Kappos on Monday, November 9th. Not surprisingly, many open source advocates are on the edge of their seats because it&#39;s an opportunity for the Supreme Court to decide that software is not patentable. Confused about the details?</summary>
<content type="html">The U.S. Supreme Court will be hearing opening arguments on Bilski vs. Kappos on Monday, November 9th. Not surprisingly, many open source advocates are on the edge of their seats because it&#39;s an opportunity for the Supreme Court to decide that software is not patentable. Confused about the details?</content>
<source>
<title>ostatic.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://ostatic.com/blog/sflc-provides-background-info-for-bilski</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>1</bx:total>
<bx:view>0</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title> US Supreme Court invites DOJ to file a brief on Arizona E-Verify lawsuit</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/-us-supreme-court-invites-doj-to-file-a-brief-on-arizona-e-verify-lawsuit/3916668744365002534-d384bbac6b8cced7ea5a7fa12b462646/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:3916668744365002534-d384bbac6b8cced7ea5a7fa12b462646</id>
<updated>2009-11-05T10:25:35.080-05:00</updated>
<summary>US Supreme Court invites DOJ to file a brief on Arizona E-Verify lawsuit E-Verify, State Law - Be first to Comment! An interesting development has surfaced in the Arizona E-Verify lawsuit...</summary>
<content type="html">US Supreme Court invites DOJ to file a brief on Arizona E-Verify lawsuit E-Verify, State Law - Be first to Comment! An interesting development has surfaced in the Arizona E-Verify lawsuit...</content>
<source>
<title>everifyandi9news.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://everifyandi9news.com/?p=359</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>3</bx:total>
<bx:view>2</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Tort Lawyers Target Mutual Funds</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/tort-lawyers-target-mutual-funds/6467825439424288893-a3f84493ab321c9158c4e4908f8f48f5/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:6467825439424288893-a3f84493ab321c9158c4e4908f8f48f5</id>
<updated>2009-11-03T06:02:38.559-05:00</updated>
<summary>If you invest in mutual funds, you should be worried about a case argued today at the U.S. Supreme Court. The lawsuit aims at overturning the way investment managers of mutual funds are paid. The process has worked well and fairly for decades.</summary>
<content type="html">If you invest in mutual funds, you should be worried about a case argued today at the U.S. Supreme Court. The lawsuit aims at overturning the way investment managers of mutual funds are paid. The process has worked well and fairly for decades.</content>
<source>
<title>online.wsj.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703574604574499461674651636.html</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>4</bx:total>
<bx:view>3</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title> Corporations shouldn&#39;t contribute to politicians | Philadelphia Inquirer</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/-corporations-shouldnt-contribute-to-politicians--philadelphia-inquirer/7734515648877645376-7d994009a1a355bc2fa8555003185389/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:7734515648877645376-7d994009a1a355bc2fa8555003185389</id>
<updated>2009-11-02T06:49:06.581-05:00</updated>
<summary>The U.S. Supreme Court (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission) is poised to allow corporations to contribute directly to political candidates&#39; campaigns, adding to all the soft money they currently spend. If it allows this, the court will...</summary>
<content type="html">The U.S. Supreme Court (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission) is poised to allow corporations to contribute directly to political candidates&#39; campaigns, adding to all the soft money they currently spend. If it allows this, the court will...</content>
<source>
<title>philly.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.philly.com/inquirer/currents/20091101_Letters__Corporations_shouldn_t_contribute_to_politicians.html</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>5</bx:total>
<bx:view>4</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Fund Directors Warily Eye Supreme Court Case</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/fund-directors-warily-eye-supreme-court-case/9877404074048657600-570c75c4e596b388e4d057533a695d18/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:9877404074048657600-570c75c4e596b388e4d057533a695d18</id>
<updated>2009-11-02T06:47:49.874-05:00</updated>
<summary>Directors of mutual-fund boards are watching warily as an important case on fund fees comes before the U.S. Supreme Court.
They fear that Jones v. Harris Associates, which the Court is set to hear on Monday, could create a new standard for setting fees and possibly open the gates to a flood of litigation, or remove directors from the fee-negotiation process altogether. If the court in some way opens the door to more fee challenges, it could also become more difficult to hire directors. </summary>
<content type="html">Directors of mutual-fund boards are watching warily as an important case on fund fees comes before the U.S. Supreme Court.
They fear that Jones v. Harris Associates, which the Court is set to hear on Monday, could create a new standard for setting fees and possibly open the gates to a flood of litigation, or remove directors from the fee-negotiation process altogether. If the court in some way opens the door to more fee challenges, it could also become more difficult to hire directors. </content>
<source>
<title>online.wsj.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091030-714811.html</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>4</bx:total>
<bx:view>3</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>U.S. Supreme Court set to hear Bilski v. Kappos</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/us-supreme-court-set-to-hear-bilski-v-kappos/13315304102702180436-d10599c07f0f1dbeec91856433e783c7/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:13315304102702180436-d10599c07f0f1dbeec91856433e783c7</id>
<updated>2009-11-02T06:24:41.378-05:00</updated>
<summary>The United States Supreme Court will hear a patent case on Nov. 9 that has implications for both method and software patents, and it has gained widespread attention from industry groups, professors and businesses looking to influence the high court’s thinking. </summary>
<content type="html">The United States Supreme Court will hear a patent case on Nov. 9 that has implications for both method and software patents, and it has gained widespread attention from industry groups, professors and businesses looking to influence the high court’s thinking. </content>
<source>
<title>sdtimes.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.sdtimes.com/link/33871</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>4</bx:total>
<bx:view>3</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>John Kass: Prosecutors want to keep their little Swiss army knife</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/john-kass-prosecutors-want-to-keep-their-little-swiss-army-knife/6478132459399655907-098efce23a5bbeba77ed08c7e5d2dcd1/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:6478132459399655907-098efce23a5bbeba77ed08c7e5d2dcd1</id>
<updated>2009-11-02T06:28:42.031-05:00</updated>
<summary>Whether they like it or not, Americans will soon be assaulted by the shrill promos for TV&#39;s &quot;Celebrity Apprentice,&quot; featuring former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, acolyte to the equally smarmy Donald Trump. Politicians of both parties will denounce...</summary>
<content type="html">Whether they like it or not, Americans will soon be assaulted by the shrill promos for TV&#39;s &quot;Celebrity Apprentice,&quot; featuring former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, acolyte to the equally smarmy Donald Trump. Politicians of both parties will denounce...</content>
<source>
<title>chicagotribune.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-kass_bd_01nov01,0,7840416.column</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>4</bx:total>
<bx:view>3</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Supreme Court Rejects &quot;Mixed-Motive&quot; Burden-Shifting Under The ADEA </title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/supreme-court-rejects-mixed-motive-burden-shifting-under-the-adea-/6894868685121788153-a5a60b0047b277de2b3b527bf73cbbdd/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:6894868685121788153-a5a60b0047b277de2b3b527bf73cbbdd</id>
<updated>2009-11-03T06:11:33.562-05:00</updated>
<summary>The U.S. Supreme Court recently held in Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc .1 that a plaintiff alleging a claim of age discrimination must, in all cases, prove by a preponderance of the evidence that age was the &quot;but-for&quot; cause of the challenged adverse employment action.</summary>
<content type="html">The U.S. Supreme Court recently held in Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc .1 that a plaintiff alleging a claim of age discrimination must, in all cases, prove by a preponderance of the evidence that age was the &quot;but-for&quot; cause of the challenged adverse employment action.</content>
<source>
<title>metrocorpcounsel.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/current.php?artType=view&amp;artMonth=November&amp;artYear=2009&amp;EntryNo=10300</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>2</bx:total>
<bx:view>1</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title> Decision against contractor is upheld</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/-decision-against-contractor-is-upheld/4063559215554773689-26ed0e26ecf9bcf7bb5342067ffa2e40/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:4063559215554773689-26ed0e26ecf9bcf7bb5342067ffa2e40</id>
<updated>2009-10-30T08:12:15.835-04:00</updated>
<summary>A federal appeals court has sided with a Georgia-based subcontractor trying to collect nearly $7 million from FaulknerUSA, the company that built the Grand Hyatt, San Antonio&#39;s convention center headquarters hotel.</summary>
<content type="html">A federal appeals court has sided with a Georgia-based subcontractor trying to collect nearly $7 million from FaulknerUSA, the company that built the Grand Hyatt, San Antonio&#39;s convention center headquarters hotel.</content>
<source>
<title>mysanantonio.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.mysanantonio.com/business/local/Appeals_court_sides_against_FaulknerUSA.html</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>3</bx:total>
<bx:view>2</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Michael W. McConnell: The Pay Czar Is Unconstitutional</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/michael-w-mcconnell-the-pay-czar-is-unconstitutional/3764169702183062317-c5a74a0ea6fb8e6f30d2f7467f95d271/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:3764169702183062317-c5a74a0ea6fb8e6f30d2f7467f95d271</id>
<updated>2009-10-30T12:53:06.970-04:00</updated>
<summary>Last week&#39;s announcement that &quot;Pay Czar&quot; Kenneth Feinberg slashed compensation for executives at seven large financial firms by an average of 50% stunned Wall Street, stoked the fires of populist resentment, and troubled economists.</summary>
<content type="html">Last week&#39;s announcement that &quot;Pay Czar&quot; Kenneth Feinberg slashed compensation for executives at seven large financial firms by an average of 50% stunned Wall Street, stoked the fires of populist resentment, and troubled economists.</content>
<source>
<title>online.wsj.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703574604574499953992328762.html?mod=googlenews_wsj</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>2</bx:total>
<bx:view>1</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>High Court Must Lower Bar For Patents</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/high-court-must-lower-bar-for-patents/17692710641867413693-8019f6e82e5a2708c00ccdbacb494167/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:17692710641867413693-8019f6e82e5a2708c00ccdbacb494167</id>
<updated>2009-10-30T12:49:18.922-04:00</updated>
<summary>Suppose, in the Internet&#39;s earlier days, you were a really smart computer programmer, and you developed a system that used advanced mathematics to allow for extremely secure online transactions. Thanks to you, things like online banking or Internet...</summary>
<content type="html">Suppose, in the Internet&#39;s earlier days, you were a really smart computer programmer, and you developed a system that used advanced mathematics to allow for extremely secure online transactions. Thanks to you, things like online banking or Internet...</content>
<source>
<title>courant.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/editorials/hc-chaclas-pitney-patent.artoct30,0,5438710.story</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>1</bx:total>
<bx:view>0</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Which State is a Nationwide Corporation’s Principal Place of Business?</title>
<link href="/business-and-the-supreme-court/which-state-is-a-nationwide-corporations-principal-place-of-business/17974087354154664695-e62496f706cfadb3708d599fe63e2861/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:17974087354154664695-e62496f706cfadb3708d599fe63e2861</id>
<updated>2009-10-30T08:17:45.837-04:00</updated>
<summary>Hertz Corp. v. Friend poses a question that has surprisingly escaped the Supreme Court’s attention until now: where is a corporation’s “principal place of business”? Hertz argues that its “principal place of business” is its corporate headquarters in New Jersey. The respondents favor a multi-factor approach that in this case points to California. </summary>
<content type="html">Hertz Corp. v. Friend poses a question that has surprisingly escaped the Supreme Court’s attention until now: where is a corporation’s “principal place of business”? Hertz argues that its “principal place of business” is its corporate headquarters in New Jersey. The respondents favor a multi-factor approach that in this case points to California. </content>
<source>
<title>scotusblog.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/which-state-is-a-nationwide-corporation%E2%80%99s-principal-place-of-business/</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Michael Fieramosca</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mfieramosca900</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/michael-fieramosca/mfieramosca900/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>1</bx:total>
<bx:view>0</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
</feed>