<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:bx="http://bx.businessweek.com">
<title>Enterprise Architecture - Business Exchange</title>
<subtitle>Most Active Articles</subtitle>
<link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/enterprise-architecture/most-active/feed" rel="self"/>
<link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/enterprise-architecture"/>
<updated>2009-11-24T02:01:03.686-05:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Business Exchange</name>
<email>Business_Exchange@businessweek.com</email>
</author>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:topic:most-active:enterprise-architecture</id>
<bx:suggester>
<bx:fullname>Kris Meukens</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>kmeukens625</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/kris-meukens/kmeukens625/"/>
</bx:suggester>
<entry>
<title> A novel Enterprise Architecture approach</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/-a-novel-enterprise-architecture-approach/4436507923947009866-83808219de1d4718af5b7596674e468a/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:4436507923947009866-83808219de1d4718af5b7596674e468a</id>
<updated>2009-11-12T09:18:16.286-05:00</updated>
<summary>Current Enterprise Architecture (EA) frameworks emphasize one aspect or another of an EA development. TOGAF is mainly about process, Zachman an ontology... The FFLV framework provides a complete picture by supporting structure (like eTOM), layers, behaviour (process), method &amp; metamodel (like DODAF), process (like TOGAF) ... It comes with reference maps, templates, governance, maturity &amp; value delivery evaluation tools. It also includes people and organization, non-IT technologies, business and operating models...</summary>
<content type="html">Current Enterprise Architecture (EA) frameworks emphasize one aspect or another of an EA development. TOGAF is mainly about process, Zachman an ontology... The FFLV framework provides a complete picture by supporting structure (like eTOM), layers, behaviour (process), method &amp; metamodel (like DODAF), process (like TOGAF) ... It comes with reference maps, templates, governance, maturity &amp; value delivery evaluation tools. It also includes people and organization, non-IT technologies, business and operating models...</content>
<source>
<title>it.toolbox.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/ea-matters/the-fflv-enterprise-architecture-framework-32150</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Adrian Grigoriu</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>agrigoriu319</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/adrian-grigoriu/agrigoriu319/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>14</bx:total>
<bx:view>14</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>You&#39;ll be far better off in a future without enterprise software</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/youll-be-far-better-off-in-a-future-without-enterprise-software/2061578645841661441-d48404373c0572946c40e1547e3cc81c/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:2061578645841661441-d48404373c0572946c40e1547e3cc81c</id>
<updated>2009-11-02T22:16:00.000-05:00</updated>
<summary>don’t spend more money on that same functionality. Rather, spend money . This is the purview of good enterprise architecture, not good enterprise software. When you ask these people to show you their enterprise software, they’ll simply point at their</summary>
<content type="html">don’t spend more money on that same functionality. Rather, spend money . This is the purview of good enterprise architecture, not good enterprise software. When you ask these people to show you their enterprise software, they’ll simply point at their</content>
<source>
<title>ZDNet</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://c.moreover.com/click/here.pl?r2308483270&amp;f=9791</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname></bx:fullname>
<bx:id></bx:id>
<bx:link href=""/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>21</bx:total>
<bx:view>21</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Architecture in 3 minutes or so</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/enterprise-architecture-in-3-minutes-or-so/15086836320303004774-1be664cf6271b2b125ef5350bebad8f6/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:15086836320303004774-1be664cf6271b2b125ef5350bebad8f6</id>
<updated>2009-09-03T06:56:42.038-04:00</updated>
<summary>A short animated Enterprise Architecture slideware from definition, business case to EA framework, artifacts and Enterprise strategic transformation.
The business architecture and Single Page Architecture concepts are illustrated.</summary>
<content type="html">A short animated Enterprise Architecture slideware from definition, business case to EA framework, artifacts and Enterprise strategic transformation.
The business architecture and Single Page Architecture concepts are illustrated.</content>
<source>
<title>authorstream.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/grigoriu-202355-enterprise-architecture-3-minutes-strategic-planning-frameworks-or-so-science-technology-ppt-powerpoint/</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Adrian Grigoriu</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>agrigoriu319</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/adrian-grigoriu/agrigoriu319/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>3</bx:total>
<bx:view>2</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>1</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>VMware to acquire privately held SpringSource</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/vmware-to-acquire-privately-held-springsource/7493915430516016869-07d371da920b2ea6cba8cc58c2c38feb/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:7493915430516016869-07d371da920b2ea6cba8cc58c2c38feb</id>
<updated>2009-08-10T16:50:40.225-04:00</updated>
<summary>VMWare said after the market closed Monday that it would acquire privately held SpringSource in a deal with a total value of $420 million. VMare will pay $362 million in cash and equity for SpringSource, plus assume $58 million in that company&#39;s unvested...</summary>
<content type="html">VMWare said after the market closed Monday that it would acquire privately held SpringSource in a deal with a total value of $420 million. VMare will pay $362 million in cash and equity for SpringSource, plus assume $58 million in that company&#39;s unvested...</content>
<source>
<title>MarketWatch</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.marketwatch.com/story/vmware-to-acquire-privately-held-springsource-2009-08-10</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Isaac Sacolick</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>isacolick111</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/isaac-sacolick/isacolick111/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>3</bx:total>
<bx:view>1</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>1</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ProtonMedia Takes Microsoft Office SharePoint Server to a New Dimension </title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/protonmedia-takes-microsoft-office-sharepoint-server-to-a-new-dimension-/12862635069317796818-8a03159024d372529e3e40343d29802f/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:12862635069317796818-8a03159024d372529e3e40343d29802f</id>
<updated>2009-09-23T15:31:35.373-04:00</updated>
<summary>ProtonMedia integrates Microsoft SharePoint to its enterprise virtual environment platform. Big news for business productivity, socialization in the enterprise.</summary>
<content type="html">ProtonMedia integrates Microsoft SharePoint to its enterprise virtual environment platform. Big news for business productivity, socialization in the enterprise.</content>
<source>
<title>businesswire.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090923005947&amp;newsLang=en</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Matt McLoughlin</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>mmcloughlin785</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/matt-mcloughlin/mmcloughlin785/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>0</bx:total>
<bx:view>0</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Architecture to Increase the Business Relevance of IT </title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/enterprise-architecture-to-increase-the-business-relevance-of-it-/16269904772666585579-a7965e4a921b5660b0543d0fcca555c6/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:16269904772666585579-a7965e4a921b5660b0543d0fcca555c6</id>
<updated>2009-06-19T03:06:07.506-04:00</updated>
<summary>CIOs are under increased pressure from business leaders to show the business relevance and value of IT. Leading CIOs are using the EA process as a key to transforming IT and addressing this challenge.</summary>
<content type="html">CIOs are under increased pressure from business leaders to show the business relevance and value of IT. Leading CIOs are using the EA process as a key to transforming IT and addressing this challenge.</content>
<source>
<title>gartner.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?id=965112&amp;ref=g_sitelink&amp;ref=g_SiteLink</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Nanda Mounasamy</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>nmounasamy210</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/nanda-mounasamy/nmounasamy210/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>12</bx:total>
<bx:view>11</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Why is the concept of “Virtual Organizations” all encompassing? An analysis from Technology, Business and Culture pov.</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/why-is-the-concept-of-virtual-organizations-all-encompassing-an-analysis-from-technology-business-and-culture-pov/1761124780533378631-1e416070e97a8cd533cd683f86e7806f/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:1761124780533378631-1e416070e97a8cd533cd683f86e7806f</id>
<updated>2009-06-11T15:56:44.820-04:00</updated>
<summary>Virtual Organizations&#39;s role is expanding to connect everything from supply chains to end-customers and the myriad opportunities that it can enable if deployed properly. The concept of Virtual Organizations is so encompassing from every angle, and it is so complex. It is pretty much the mother of all buzz words in IT and requires a deep strategic analysis by CIOs. Simply speaking we can broadly analyze this topic from technology, business and cultural perspectives.</summary>
<content type="html">Virtual Organizations&#39;s role is expanding to connect everything from supply chains to end-customers and the myriad opportunities that it can enable if deployed properly. The concept of Virtual Organizations is so encompassing from every angle, and it is so complex. It is pretty much the mother of all buzz words in IT and requires a deep strategic analysis by CIOs. Simply speaking we can broadly analyze this topic from technology, business and cultural perspectives.</content>
<source>
<title>tushneem.wordpress.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://tushneem.wordpress.com/2009/05/24/why-is-the-concept-of-virtual-organizations-all-encompassing-an-analysis-from-technology-business-and-culture-pov/</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Tushneem Dharmagadda</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>tdharmagadda725</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/tushneem-dharmagadda/tdharmagadda725/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>3</bx:total>
<bx:view>1</bx:view>
<bx:save>1</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>1</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Extended Enterprise Architecture Framework (E2AF) Template</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/extended-enterprise-architecture-framework-e2af-template/3733782506467168939-4b378f5a24bd6f2734b414a85bdad34b/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:3733782506467168939-4b378f5a24bd6f2734b414a85bdad34b</id>
<updated>2009-02-09T03:39:00.000-05:00</updated>
<summary>You can download the document here as a zipped file from his post.   Technorati Tags: Enterprise Architecture,E2AF. Share this post :</summary>
<content type="html">You can download the document here as a zipped file from his post.   Technorati Tags: Enterprise Architecture,E2AF. Share this post :</content>
<source>
<title>MSDN Blogs</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mikewalker/archive/2009/02/09/extended-enterprise-architecture-framework-e2af-template.aspx</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname></bx:fullname>
<bx:id></bx:id>
<bx:link href=""/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>24</bx:total>
<bx:view>24</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Forrester Enterprise Architecture Blog</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/forrester-enterprise-architecture-blog/2443597489472981733-313a2dedddddf12fefdc20fa2d5c3422/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:2443597489472981733-313a2dedddddf12fefdc20fa2d5c3422</id>
<updated>2009-02-18T14:29:44.001-05:00</updated>
<summary></summary>
<content type="html"></content>
<source>
<title>blogs.forrester.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://blogs.forrester.com/ea/</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Kris Meukens</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>kmeukens625</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/kris-meukens/kmeukens625/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>11</bx:total>
<bx:view>11</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Teleconference: Six Trends For Enterprise Architecture Pros In 2009</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/teleconference-six-trends-for-enterprise-architecture-pros-in-2009/9952006759540881766-80aef63b354f44a959122535f852232d/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:9952006759540881766-80aef63b354f44a959122535f852232d</id>
<updated>2009-02-04T02:55:00.000-05:00</updated>
<summary>format (audio with PowerPoint slides). Choose the format that is convenient for you. Presented By: Who should attend: Enterprise Architecture professionals Description: Enterprise architecture (EA) will continue its journey up the value chain in 2009,</summary>
<content type="html">format (audio with PowerPoint slides). Choose the format that is convenient for you. Presented By: Who should attend: Enterprise Architecture professionals Description: Enterprise architecture (EA) will continue its journey up the value chain in 2009,</content>
<source>
<title>Forrester</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://c.moreover.com/click/here.pl?r1804519590&amp;f=9791</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname></bx:fullname>
<bx:id></bx:id>
<bx:link href=""/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>13</bx:total>
<bx:view>13</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Standards Matter: The Battle For Interoperability Goes On -- IT Standards</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/standards-matter-the-battle-for-interoperability-goes-on----it-standards/9788682564876369394-13172efeeb62ed25c02062c50a2d1fac/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:9788682564876369394-13172efeeb62ed25c02062c50a2d1fac</id>
<updated>2009-04-22T14:38:41.458-04:00</updated>
<summary>Used to be, vendors didn&#39;t brazenly fracture standards. Sure, they sought lock-in opportunities, but most knew that if they played too fast and loose, the market would mete out punishment, as in the &#39;90s when TCP/IP rule breakers lost sales.
Times have changed, and not for the better. Take network access control. Cisco (NSDQ: CSCO) has all but abandoned its NAC framework and partner program. Microsoft (NSDQ: MSFT) threw some of its Network Access Protection specifications to the Trusted Computing Group, but Cisco consistently has refused to even acknowledge the TCG&#39;s legitimacy. So much for interoperability.</summary>
<content type="html">Used to be, vendors didn&#39;t brazenly fracture standards. Sure, they sought lock-in opportunities, but most knew that if they played too fast and loose, the market would mete out punishment, as in the &#39;90s when TCP/IP rule breakers lost sales.
Times have changed, and not for the better. Take network access control. Cisco (NSDQ: CSCO) has all but abandoned its NAC framework and partner program. Microsoft (NSDQ: MSFT) threw some of its Network Access Protection specifications to the Trusted Computing Group, but Cisco consistently has refused to even acknowledge the TCG&#39;s legitimacy. So much for interoperability.</content>
<source>
<title>informationweek.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.informationweek.com/news/infrastructure/management/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=216600011</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Jacques Surveyer</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>jsurveyer123</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/jacques-surveyer/jsurveyer123/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>2</bx:total>
<bx:view>1</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>1</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>eWeek Slideshow Assessing the Sun-Oracle Fit</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/eweek-slideshow-assessing-the-sun-oracle-fit/10531537075311707032-2d653d6df8d41fcafd6015d997dd1e81/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:10531537075311707032-2d653d6df8d41fcafd6015d997dd1e81</id>
<updated>2009-04-22T13:46:50.713-04:00</updated>
<summary>Looks in details at the major systems fit on the software side between Sun and Oracle. </summary>
<content type="html">Looks in details at the major systems fit on the software side between Sun and Oracle. </content>
<source>
<title>eweek.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Database/Product-Synergies-and-Overlaps-of-a-Combined-OracleSun-277361/</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Jacques Surveyer</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>jsurveyer123</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/jacques-surveyer/jsurveyer123/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>1</bx:total>
<bx:view>0</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>1</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Are you milking the most out of IT in your Enterprise? Lessons from Circuit City.</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/are-you-milking-the-most-out-of-it-in-your-enterprise-lessons-from-circuit-city/15944579211595792549-badabb72b24d6f47115c189dd219fc00/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:15944579211595792549-badabb72b24d6f47115c189dd219fc00</id>
<updated>2009-06-11T15:47:23.695-04:00</updated>
<summary>Last week I was listening to the CEO of Circuit City Jim Marcum and executives from FTI Inc., the consultants to the company managing Chapter 7 and the restructuring process, talk about how and why Circuit City went bankrupt. The decline of Circuit City...</summary>
<content type="html">Last week I was listening to the CEO of Circuit City Jim Marcum and executives from FTI Inc., the consultants to the company managing Chapter 7 and the restructuring process, talk about how and why Circuit City went bankrupt. The decline of Circuit City...</content>
<source>
<title>tushneem.wordpress.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://tushneem.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/how-much-is-too-much-are-you-getting-the-most-out-of-the-it-in-your-enterprise/</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Tushneem Dharmagadda</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>tdharmagadda725</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/tushneem-dharmagadda/tdharmagadda725/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>0</bx:total>
<bx:view>0</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise 2.0 – Please for heaven’s sake it is NOT Facebook &amp; Twitter…</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/enterprise-20--please-for-heavens-sake-it-is-not-facebook--twitter/558899593758638426-f3fd9c0b4728e4f468e59c40e4c52b07/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:558899593758638426-f3fd9c0b4728e4f468e59c40e4c52b07</id>
<updated>2009-06-11T15:51:13.080-04:00</updated>
<summary>Panelists and CIOs keep talking about platforms like LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter, about how organizations should break down the barriers and leverage these platforms, ultimately getting onto the Enterprise 2.0 bandwagon. But is that really Enterprise 2.0? Hell no...</summary>
<content type="html">Panelists and CIOs keep talking about platforms like LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter, about how organizations should break down the barriers and leverage these platforms, ultimately getting onto the Enterprise 2.0 bandwagon. But is that really Enterprise 2.0? Hell no...</content>
<source>
<title>tushneem.wordpress.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://tushneem.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/enterprise-2-0-please-for-heavens-sake-it-is-not-facebook-twitter/</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Tushneem Dharmagadda</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>tdharmagadda725</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/tushneem-dharmagadda/tdharmagadda725/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>0</bx:total>
<bx:view>0</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title> Oracle now the Left Coast Big Blue</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/-oracle-now-the-left-coast-big-blue/8585458146340703782-03702537c2c746998061520bf481f1a6/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:8585458146340703782-03702537c2c746998061520bf481f1a6</id>
<updated>2009-04-20T19:16:35.464-04:00</updated>
<summary> I thought of titling this posting as “Sam P. ? Is that a Sunny Yolk on You?” - but I didn’t. Instead I would like to ask Barrons to reconsider elevating Sam P. to the exhalted ranks of Best of Barrons CEOs.</summary>
<content type="html"> I thought of titling this posting as “Sam P. ? Is that a Sunny Yolk on You?” - but I didn’t. Instead I would like to ask Barrons to reconsider elevating Sam P. to the exhalted ranks of Best of Barrons CEOs.</content>
<source>
<title>theopensourcery.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.theopensourcery.com/keepopen/?p=1198</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Jacques Surveyer</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>jsurveyer123</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/jacques-surveyer/jsurveyer123/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>1</bx:total>
<bx:view>0</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>1</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Infosys provides more insights into their survey around EA Tools</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/infosys-provides-more-insights-into-their-survey-around-ea-tools/10157831213796939064-ff491e1f873c405f8eb059cf88194d31/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:10157831213796939064-ff491e1f873c405f8eb059cf88194d31</id>
<updated>2009-04-16T03:52:14.000-04:00</updated>
<summary>In the post from Mohan Babu entitled EA - Enterprise Architecture or Extreme Aggravation: Observations and musings on Enterprise Architecture Tools he provides some of his thoughts on the data gathered. This is a great post and he shares many of the same thoughts I have about the industry as well. It&#39;s worth the read. Here is what he had to say: In my previous EA blog entry, I had written about contextualizing Infosys’ Enterprise Architecture survey findings. Since then I had an opportunity to observe and reflect on an aspect of the survey: adoption – and challenges - of Enterprise Architecture Tool at a Global 500 enterprise. To set the context for the discussion, a brief extract from the survey report as it pertains to adoption of EA tools: - There is an increased adoption of EA tools, but there is no product which has managed to dominate the market - The EA tools market is fragmented with the vast majority of respondents claiming to use general office and collaboration tools and drawing tools (e.g. Microsoft Visio) for Enterprise Architecture Modeling This should not surprise many of us in the industry! During the past few years, I have worked with clients that have adopted Enterprise Architecture tools to varying degrees of success. Very few, at a considerable cost and effort, claim to achieve the utopian goal of mapping an enterprise architecture continuum in an ongoing basis (the stuff tool vendor case studies and marchitecture are made of). Why the high rate of dissatisfaction? Ask Enterprise Architects for a wish list in an EA tool and it could go somewhat like this: - Create and manage models of the Enterprise Architecture - Support Business Architecture requirements (BPMN, BPML etc) - Maintain traceability among elements of the EA - Publish standards and manage exceptions to standards - Manage requirements - Manage the existing portfolio of systems (the EA realized) - Manage requests for architecture work - Track changes to the Enterprise Architecture - Communicate the Enterprise Architecture to multiple audiences - Publish policies, principles, procedures and methods - Report on the Enterprise Architecture to management - Allow architects and managers to simulate the effects of change You can find more at the Infosys EA blog: http://www.infosysblogs.com/ea/2009/04/observations_and_musings_on_en.html Technorati Tags: Enterprise Architecture</summary>
<content type="html">In the post from Mohan Babu entitled EA - Enterprise Architecture or Extreme Aggravation: Observations and musings on Enterprise Architecture Tools he provides some of his thoughts on the data gathered. This is a great post and he shares many of the same thoughts I have about the industry as well. It&#39;s worth the read. Here is what he had to say: In my previous EA blog entry, I had written about contextualizing Infosys’ Enterprise Architecture survey findings. Since then I had an opportunity to observe and reflect on an aspect of the survey: adoption – and challenges - of Enterprise Architecture Tool at a Global 500 enterprise. To set the context for the discussion, a brief extract from the survey report as it pertains to adoption of EA tools: - There is an increased adoption of EA tools, but there is no product which has managed to dominate the market - The EA tools market is fragmented with the vast majority of respondents claiming to use general office and collaboration tools and drawing tools (e.g. Microsoft Visio) for Enterprise Architecture Modeling This should not surprise many of us in the industry! During the past few years, I have worked with clients that have adopted Enterprise Architecture tools to varying degrees of success. Very few, at a considerable cost and effort, claim to achieve the utopian goal of mapping an enterprise architecture continuum in an ongoing basis (the stuff tool vendor case studies and marchitecture are made of). Why the high rate of dissatisfaction? Ask Enterprise Architects for a wish list in an EA tool and it could go somewhat like this: - Create and manage models of the Enterprise Architecture - Support Business Architecture requirements (BPMN, BPML etc) - Maintain traceability among elements of the EA - Publish standards and manage exceptions to standards - Manage requirements - Manage the existing portfolio of systems (the EA realized) - Manage requests for architecture work - Track changes to the Enterprise Architecture - Communicate the Enterprise Architecture to multiple audiences - Publish policies, principles, procedures and methods - Report on the Enterprise Architecture to management - Allow architects and managers to simulate the effects of change You can find more at the Infosys EA blog: http://www.infosysblogs.com/ea/2009/04/observations_and_musings_on_en.html Technorati Tags: Enterprise Architecture</content>
<source>
<title>Mike Walker&#39;s Blog</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MikeWalker/~3/W9spRIcwSpc/infosys-provides-more-insights-into-their-survey-around-ea-tools.html</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname></bx:fullname>
<bx:id></bx:id>
<bx:link href=""/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>4</bx:total>
<bx:view>4</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Mark Smith on The Dead End for Business Activity Monitoring (BAM)</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/mark-smith-on-the-dead-end-for-business-activity-monitoring-bam/17080366988102360846-1811532827473ea45ad40cca927c0e4d/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:17080366988102360846-1811532827473ea45ad40cca927c0e4d</id>
<updated>2009-04-13T18:30:25.501-04:00</updated>
<summary>I have had many inquiries and questions about the acronym, BAM – business activity monitoring, and the relevant meaning of this focus and the technology supporting it over the last year. BAM is an interesting evolution of industry discussion and technology that has arisen from the need to monitor transaction in applications for providing notification from conditions and thresholds being hit that need attention. Of course the acronym has evolved over the years to include other capabilities but the major thrust is about monitoring which is important but not the benefit of that is found from taking immediate action. </summary>
<content type="html">I have had many inquiries and questions about the acronym, BAM – business activity monitoring, and the relevant meaning of this focus and the technology supporting it over the last year. BAM is an interesting evolution of industry discussion and technology that has arisen from the need to monitor transaction in applications for providing notification from conditions and thresholds being hit that need attention. Of course the acronym has evolved over the years to include other capabilities but the major thrust is about monitoring which is important but not the benefit of that is found from taking immediate action. </content>
<source>
<title>ventanaresearch.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.ventanaresearch.com/blog/commentblog.aspx?id=3099</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Mark Smith</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>msmith670</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/mark-smith/msmith670/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>1</bx:total>
<bx:view>1</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Architecture in Turbulent Times</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/architecture-in-turbulent-times/5383263137166743886-518b9f6c5f24f7f437cadff82d5431dd/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:5383263137166743886-518b9f6c5f24f7f437cadff82d5431dd</id>
<updated>2009-02-27T20:10:00.000-05:00</updated>
<summary>This article aims to show architects a way to understand key forces on the business of IT, what they can do to add value, and the key areas of focus</summary>
<content type="html">This article aims to show architects a way to understand key forces on the business of IT, what they can do to add value, and the key areas of focus</content>
<source>
<title>Featured Content</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://services.social.microsoft.com/feeds/FeedItem?feedId=1283a6e9-f8da-409e-9661-7e6ce2f2db2d&amp;itemId=677fac28-6ea9-40b5-a86a-589fbe4116c7&amp;title=Architecture+in+Turbulent+Times&amp;uri=http%3a%2f%2fmsdn.microsoft.com%2fen-us%2farchitecture%2fdd547403.aspx&amp;k</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname></bx:fullname>
<bx:id></bx:id>
<bx:link href=""/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>4</bx:total>
<bx:view>4</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Kevin Meeks evaluates GlassFish ESB, and a free GlassFish ESB tutorial</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/kevin-meeks-evaluates-glassfish-esb-and-a-free-glassfish-esb-tutorial/7013153437297432834-c76a52fb0c6c15bf6508bf4408be8dde/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:7013153437297432834-c76a52fb0c6c15bf6508bf4408be8dde</id>
<updated>2009-02-03T17:48:00.000-05:00</updated>
<summary>Kevin Meeks evaluated a number of different Open Source projects for for an enterprise architecture technology stack, one of them being GlassFish ESB . He published his findings in an article on developer.com .</summary>
<content type="html">Kevin Meeks evaluated a number of different Open Source projects for for an enterprise architecture technology stack, one of them being GlassFish ESB . He published his findings in an article on developer.com .</content>
<source>
<title>Sun Bloggers</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://blogs.sun.com/theaquarium/entry/kevin_meeks_on_open_source</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname></bx:fullname>
<bx:id></bx:id>
<bx:link href=""/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>4</bx:total>
<bx:view>4</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Brad Meyers&#39; Enterprise Architecture Blog</title>
<link href="/enterprise-architecture/brad-meyers-enterprise-architecture-blog/17538628645787252106-2734ffd20f579539c1d12e03857628e1/"/>
<id>urn:com:businessweek:bx:article:17538628645787252106-2734ffd20f579539c1d12e03857628e1</id>
<updated>2009-02-18T14:32:07.484-05:00</updated>
<summary></summary>
<content type="html"></content>
<source>
<title>enterprisearchitectureblog.com</title>
</source>
<bx:external-link>http://www.enterprisearchitectureblog.com/</bx:external-link>
<bx:adder>
<bx:fullname>Kris Meukens</bx:fullname>
<bx:id>kmeukens625</bx:id>
<bx:link href="http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/kris-meukens/kmeukens625/"/>
</bx:adder>
<bx:action>
<bx:total>0</bx:total>
<bx:view>0</bx:view>
<bx:save>0</bx:save>
<bx:reaction>0</bx:reaction>
</bx:action>
</entry>
</feed>