As 2009 drew close to its end, the Supreme Court turned down an opportunity to decide a case many lawyers believed could set new precedent regarding the admissibility of expert testimony. But earlier in the year, in a key criminal case, the court affirmed the right of a defendant to confront experts who prepare prosecution evidence.
This article was originally published in BullsEye, a...
Join Business Exchange
to access the most
relevant content for you,
filtered by like-minded
business professionals.
Learn more
This article has:
- 1 view
Reactions to The Top 10 Expert Rulings of 2009
Join Business Exchange
to access the most relevant content for you, filtered by like-minded business professionals. Learn more
account
account